Matt 15: Neither do men light a candle, and put it under a bushel, but on a candle stick; and it giveth light unto all that are in the house.

 

 Past this, we each are responsible unto God for getting into the Scriptures ourselves. It's kind of like an unjust town official or governor. If enough people in that town know what righteousness truly is, then they'll know whether that town official should represent them or not, and get that individual out of office if needs be. Likewise, in God's Church, there should be discipline also. But if the congregation is ignorant of God's Word, then they're open to all sorts of abominations of idol worship, i.e., man's doctrines replacing God's Truth.


    
 One example is those who teach that Easter is the day Christians should observe as representing Christ's resurrection, based on handed down traditions, and that one occurrence of the word 'Easter' in Acts. Anyone with common sense should see a problem with this if they have read and understood The Gospel for themselves; meaning on what time observance The Last Supper and crucifixion was held (The Feast of Passover). The point I'm trying to make is that in many Churches today, the congregation would boot out someone teaching God's Word full strength.

Many do not understand that the Kenites (Hebrew for 'sons of Cain') have taken over many Church organization headquarters, and determine how and what doctrines are taught to the congregations at the lowest levels within that group.

 "Well, can you document that in God's Word?" Sure; that's what I'm doing with this Web site. It is not that difficult to expel many false doctrines taught in various Churches today; if you study God's Word and you are familiar with the manuscripts. How many Churches could disprove these teachings from God's Word using a Strong's Concordance, the Hebrew Massorah notes in the oldest Hebrew manuscripts, and even the Greek manuscripts? How many Churches teach with knowledge of the manuscripts? Especially, how many Churches would these teachings be accepted in today? Very few;

 Because many Churches have gotten away from God's Truth, and are teaching 'doctrines of men' traditions handed down from who knows where, that are not in God's Word.
  
   I'm not against God's Church which is the Body of Christ's believers. If you're in a good Bible teaching Church which reveals the deeper Word, hang on to them; support it.


     
Let's consider this creation account of 'adam' in Gen.1 compared to the forming of 'eth' Ha' adham' in Gen.2 some more. The main point I wish to impress upon your reasoning is that this 'eth' Ha' adham' (the man named 'Adam') was 'formed' separate of the 'created' 'adam' (general mankind) of Gen.1:26. 

 

 This man named 'Adam’ or ‘eth ‘Ha’adham’ in the Hebrew, had a separate forming' and dwelling for example, in the Garden of God or Eden.

 

Gen.2:8-17: Read All.

 

The dwelling of the various races ('adam' without the article in the Hebrew) was outside Eden, or beyond God's paradise. This teaching is in line with;

 

 Gen.4:16: where "...Cain went out from the presence of the LORD, and dwelt in the land of Nod, on the east of Eden." (Gen.4:16).

 

 It is safe to assume that the 'land of Nod' was where Cain took his wife from, as stated in Gen.4:17: And Cain knew his wife; and she conceived, and bare Enoch: and he builded a city, and called the name of the city, after the name of his son, Enoch.