he is exalted among men and adored by millions of faithful believers who joyfully sing his praise. Darwin has been deified, and so it won't be long until someone finds that his image has evolved on a grilled cheese sandwich. The God of the atheist

 

The normal "idolater" creates a version of God to which he can snuggle up. In his mind, he creates an all-loving, kind, and forgiving God. He leaves out the fact that the Bible tells us that God is holy and just, and will by no means clear the guilty. He passes over verses such as "Everyone proud in heart is an abomination to the Lord; though they join forces, none will go unpunished"

Proverbs 16:5 Everyone that is proud in heart is an abomination to the the LORD: Though hand join in hand, he shall not be unpunished.

Then once he has created his benevolent image of God, he bows before it, and it is to that image that he brings his prayerful petitions. The problem is, his god doesn’t exist. But that is of no consequence to him, because the idolater can easily find a church that preaches the attributes of his idol.

The atheist does the exact opposite of the regular idolater. He constructs his idol with material from the Scriptures, and he may even call it a "Megalo-maniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully." Then, once he has made his idol, he flatly rejects it. And so he should. The image that he has made of God, is evil. It is without love and mercy.

And so the atheist has the same result as the idolater. The image only exists in his mind--in the place of imagery...in his imagination.

 

The atheists problem with females.

All animals, all fish and reptiles have the ability to reproduce of their own kind because they have females within the species. No male can reproduce and keep its kind alive without a female of the same species. Dogs, cats, horses, cattle, elephants, humans, giraffes, lions, tigers, birds, fish, and reptiles all came into being having both male and female. If any species came into existence without a mature female present (with complimentary female components), that one male would have remained alone and in time died. The species could not have survived without a female. Why did hundreds of thousands of animals, fish, reptiles and birds (over millions of years) evolve a female partner (that coincidentally matured at just the right time) with each species?

In contrast, the Bible maintains that God instantaneously created man (in His own image) and woman, giving them the ability to reproduce after their kind. So the Bible and the theory of Darwinian evolution are not only opposed to one another, they are incompatible. The only commonality is that they are both miraculous, and they both require faith to believe them.

Those who believe in the theory of evolution are passionate, and for a good reason. If Darwin was right, man is simply an animal with no moral accountability, and his desires therefore to procreate are merely natural survival instincts.

However, if the Bible is true, it throws a huge, cold, and heavy wet blanket over man's desire to follow his sexual instincts. It not only says that he is accountable, but that there will be severe retribution for his adultery, fornication, and even for lust.

Matthew 5:27-28

27 Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, “ Thou shalt not commit adultery:’’

28 But I say unto you, that whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.

If we know that with all of his genius, man cannot create anything from nothing, how intellectually preposterous is it to actually believe that in the beginning nothing created everything? Atheism is off the charts of human foolishness. By contrast, the flat-earther is a real genius. That’s why an atheist has no scientific creditably, because his “nothing created everything” violates the basic laws of science.